Category Archives: Culture

Leaders Lead Culture

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

Leaders’ Actions Define Organizational Culture Leaders shape culture. Organizations mirror the people that lead them. We have a client who started building his business 15 years ago. He never met a customer he didn’t want to serve. If someone had money they wanted to spend for his type of product, he was going to make sure he got the business. He had a “can-do attitude” that made anything possible.

Several hundred million dollars in annual revenue and a few hundred employees later, he has built a remarkable organization that serves some of the most sought after customers in the industry. But during the last few years, profits have stalled, the organization has experienced extremely high turnover, and there is a sense of defeat that permeates the organization.

What went wrong? In a nutshell, the leadership style and the culture that it grew that were perfect for a small startup are now strangling profitability. The “we can make it work” ethic that was the hallmark of getting this company off the ground is now positioned to be the death of it. The leader that couldn’t say “no” to a customer 15 years ago now leads a company that still can’t say no to a customer. Even customers that ask for things the organization just can’t do profitably. The organization can’t say no to suppliers that are no longer providing quality products at a price that makes sense. And they can’t say no to employees who aren’t working out – instead, hiring more people rather than having the right people.

Taken together, all of it is leading to declining profits, rampant cynicism, and increasing turnover.

How can this organization regain the forward momentum they once had? It has to start with the leader. To get to the root of the problems, he is starting to recognize that he is part of difficulties.  As he evolves, so will the organization.  As he matures and develops a more reasoned decision making process, so will the organization.  He is backing away from things he is not very good at, he is listening to his employees, and he is getting rid of customers that are unprofitable.

If the culture is going to change, the leader needs to lead the way.

Changing for the Workforce of the Future

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

Can you imagine fully half of the people who work for your company being either contractors, temporary workers, or freelancers?  That may very well be the future we face.

A 2012 Economic Intelligence Unit Study shows that by the year 2030, 50% of the workforce will be made up of contingent workers.  The U.S. contingent workforce is made up of self-employed individuals, independent service firms, entrepreneurs and temporary workers. By 2020, 40 percent of American workers, or nearly 65 million people, will be contingent, and shortly thereafter that percentage is expected to rise to 50 percent.

Others confirm that the use of contingent workers is already on the rise, and will continue.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics as well as reports from the Staffing Industry Analysts, a research and advisory firm focused on staffing and contingent labor, have demonstrated that the number of contingent workers has been increasing year over year for a few years.  And in June 2011, over 34% of the 2000 organizations surveyed by the McKinsey Global Institute said they plan to use more temporary labor in the next five years.

The trend is clear.  But are organizations ready for it?

Work in the future will be more collaborative, flexible, and goal oriented.  Temporary workers will need to be sharp, and stay sharp, to keep their jobs.  An organiztaion with more and more people flowing into and out of it will need to be radically different than today.

A current client of ours is working on a large project that requires a lot of consultants.  A full time staff person spends over 80% of her time giving out and tracking computers that are given to consultants.  Can you imagine if half of their workforce was contingent?  If the task of managing assets is so cumbersome now, the process and technology implications of a 50% contingent workforce would be astounding.

We have several large clients that are working on becoming more “digitally enabled” in order to meet the needs of their customers.  But with all we have heard from clients about embracing technology to meet the needs of future customers, we have not heard any talk at all about how to be more digitally enabled to meet the needs of their future workers.   The shift to more temporary workers will change how an organization works with its people in profound ways.

Current technology certainly makes workers more “plug and play” ready.  But it will need to make significant strides to meet the needs of a future more transient workforce.

Our clients will have to re-think how they manage people, how groups form and disband to tackle work, how people are on-boarded and rolled-off, how corporate cultures are built and maintained, how they attract and evaluate temporary workers.

They will also need to embrace technology and new digital technologies in an entirely new way. More digital maturity can help organizations build stronger connection to their staff… especially temporary staff.  Not only allowing access, but also targeting communication, facilitating relationships between roles, connecting people to other people and ideas.

Organizations that will win with workers of the future will be more mobile, and will be more agile by providing more personalized or customized needs for each temporary worker.  They will flex based on the work, the location, the worker, and the required interfaces with other people within the organization.

If you are thinking about where your organization will be in 20 years, think about your customers, your products, and your markets.  The demands they place on your organization will certainly challenge you to change.  But also think about your staff.  You might be surprised at the magnitude of change that meeting their unique needs challenges you to also.

Organizational Muscles to Manage Change

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

We have been working with several large organizations lately that are trying to build their internal ability to manage ongoing change.  Change is the new normal for many organizations.  Managing how people adapt and adopt change is something that many are seeing as a critical competency.

Change Management is the discipline of helping people in an organization get ready, willing, and able to work in new ways that are required by a change.   Many leaders that see a long string of changes ahead of them are looking to build an internal Change Management competency.  They, in effect, are trying to build their change muscles so that they can handle the seemingly endless series of changes headed for them.

Organizations that build a Change Management competency do a few things.

First, they foster leadership sponsorship for employing Change Management.  Leaders at the highest levels know what Change Management is and why managing change will help them change more successfully.  And they are committed to making Change Management a strong capability in the organization.  They are willing to stand up in front of the effort,  to put money where their mouth is, and walk the talk.

Second, these organizations use a common methodology and model  for managing change.  Having a common Change Management framework across the organization builds a common language that shapes the way people think and talk about change.  A common model also introduces methods and tools that can help people in the organization actually do the work of managing change.

 

Third, organizations that have a Change Management competency have a broad based understanding of the value of Change Management throughout all levels of the organization.  Everyone has a baseline understanding of why people make the difference between successful organizational change and unsuccessful change, and why managing change is important.

These organizations also each have a strong and capable Change Management team.  A group of people in the organization who are focused on supporting the organization as they begin incorporating Change Management into their projects and change efforts helps the new practices take hold.  The Change Management group has highly capable team members, clear roles and responsibilities, and an appropriate or organization structure.

Lastly, organizations that have a strong Change Management competency reinforce effectively managed change.  When projects succeed because teams have helped people in the organization engage and adopt new work, they are celebrated and rewarded.  Leaders eagerly to put effective changes in the limelight, and the organization learns what successful change looks like.

If you see change coming at your organization like a speeding train, don’t hide.  Instead, develop a change management competency.   That way, you can face change head-on now, and you will be ready for all of the changes to come in the future.

Change an Organization’s Culture? Yes You Can!

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

We often think that culture is a messy, squishy thing that we can’t really get our arms around.  And culture often makes leaders uncomfortable because they don’t feel that they can “put their finger on it”.

But there are lots of ways to measure culture these days (just spend a little time on Google or Yahoo! and you will be overwhelmed with the standardized tools, customizable assessments and consultants you’ll find).  And there are lots of companies out there that can attest to their success in building the right culture for their organization.

Just measuring and assessing an organization’s culture at a given point in time is illuminating.  But actually defining what the strategically appropriate culture is for an organization is even more helpful.  Once an organization has a desired culture in mind, and a picture of the current culture, then assessing the gaps and developing plans to close the gaps is all that it takes.

But, don’t be fooled.  Defining the desired culture for an organization sounds easier than it really is.  Getting a group of leaders together to discuss whether it is more important to follow rules or act quickly can be a touchy conversation.  Since culture is an outgrowth to a large extent of leadership, much of the culture is shaped by individual leaders’ styles and work preferences.  If you have a leader who is generally hesitant to make decisions and stick to them, then you may very well end up with an organization that talks about the same issue week after week in meetings but never lands on “what are going to do about it?”

Some think that it’s too hard to change culture… that we can’t change it even if we know what gaps we have between our current state and our desired culture.  Not true.  There are real, tactical activities and leadership actions that can shape a new culture.

For example, if the organization lacks the needed focus on customers, then insist that every manager and above spend at least one day a quarter out in the field with customers.  Or if your organization makes decisions on the fly in the absence of adequate data (not a good thing for, say, a pharmaceutical company), then insist that all projects use Six Sigma or similar tools.  Or if your organization is too cautious and can’t move quickly enough to respond to new demands (not a good thing for, say, a software company), verbally encourage teams to make decisions faster and try new things… and then throw a big party the first time one fails as visible demonstration that we appreciate and value risk-taking and new ideas.

One thing that can’t be overlooked, however, is that “closing the gap” between the current organization and the desired future organization often requires things of leaders… new communication styles, new approaches to work, new ways to lead.  This is often the hardest part.  Certainly there is some impact on culture from the structures and processes and kinds of people who work in an organization; but largely, people look up to see what kind of behavior is acceptable.  If you are up, then you are being watched whether you like it or not.

If we really want to make that strategy happen, we can’t ignore our organization’s culture.  And if that culture is not the right one to make the strategy happen, then that culture needs to change.  If we as leaders decide that we don’t want to do our part to change the culture, then we will live with the consequences of a failed strategy.

Count Your Successes

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

Mom used to always say “count your blessings”.  As the year comes to an end, organizations should to the same – with a twist.

If you work in an organization that is making plans for the new year, you should “count your successes”.

The path to growth and improvement can be long and bumpy.  There can be detours, side-tracks, unexpected challenges.   And that long, bumpy ride can make progress feel like a failure.

But if you stop, take a breath, and look back, you will see how far you’ve come.  It may not be as far as you wanted, but it’s almost always further than you thought it was before you took the time to look back and count your successes.

For the people who work in an organization, taking the time to reinforce the progress that has been made and the good work that has been done is invaluable.  Nothing motivates a team like a bit of success.  A winning team is pumped and ready to go out and win again.

This doesn’t mean you should completely ignore things that have not gone well.  But for just a moment, don’t focus on the misses.  Focus only on the hits.  Tell people that too… “I know it hasn’t been perfect.  We can talk about all of the ways we could have done better another time.  For now, let’s just be proud of all that we have accomplished.”

So take time to count the successes your organization has had over the last year.  And celebrate!

Building an Organization that Can Change Again and Again

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

You don’t need a lot of research to show you that change in organizations is an ever increasing phenomena.  New technologies, new products, new competitors, new regulations, new people with new values and experiences.  Every day, organizations try to stay one step ahead of their competitors by changing to meet the needs of their customers either cheaper or faster or both.

Not too long ago, many started recognizing that change within organizations needed to be proactively managed.  Those that were forward- thinking started working explicitly to help the people in their organizations get ready, willing, and able to work in new ways that were required for future success.

Those that hoped people would just “get with the program” or “do what I said because I said so” have lived (and died) with the results of low productivity, engagement, and performance relative to their more enlightened competitors.

For the organizations that have worked hard to manage the people aspects of change explicitly, the rewards have been forthcoming.  But change is speeding up.  As soon as one change is “complete”, it seems another is starting up.  Just paying attention to managing the people aspects of organizational change will not be good enough as time goes by.  The organizations that thrive in the long
term need to develop an organizational change competency.  Change needs to become part of an organizations culture and DNA.

Given the pace of business change today and in the future, building a change management competency is going to be a clear competitive advantage for organizations of the future.  Organizations that are really good at helping their people move from thinking and acting in existing ways to thinking and acting in new ways that are required for the organization’s success are the ones that are going to beat their competition every time.

For lots of years, organizations have viewed change as an event.  Implementing an ERP system.  Reengineering processes.  Redesigning an organization.  Spinning off a division or merging with another entity.  Some have grinned and bared it just waiting for the pain to stop.  Others have learned to muscle through with less pain, but memories that are less than fond.  And still others have gotten pretty good at managing these kinds of change events.

Organizations range from having no change management focus or skill at all, to complete integration and competence in managing the people side of change.

What does it take to build an internal change management competency?  Some organizations are building change management functions or centers of expertise (such as Motorola).  Having a team of people who are dedicated to focusing only on the human elements of change ensures that it is not forgotten.

Other organizations are developing and adopting common tools and techniques that can be used across an organization to manage change.  For example, Johnson & Johnson has their “Change Integration Process” and General Electric has their “Change Acceleration Process”.  The use of a common language and approach to manage the people aspects of change speeds up the process of managing change and instills a mindset that helping people navigate through change is important.

If you don’t want to create your own model for managing the people aspects of change, then adopt one that’s out there already that fits your organization’s level of sophistication and experience.  Start letting people in the organization know why managing change is important.  The act alone of teaching staff about a change management process and tools sends a powerful signal to employees that
the people part of change is important.  And build the skills, tools, and common language to help people start doing the work.

Change management is the next frontier of business improvement for organizations of all sizes.  Just as Six Sigma and Lean started with big companies and “trickled down” to smaller organizations and became a real competitive advantage for some, effectively managing ongoing change is starting to trickle down.  If you can be ahead of the next guy by building an organization that is capable of managing people during change, you won’t be sorry.

Priority #1 During Change: Leadership Alignment and Sponsorship

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

Studies over the years have continued to confirm what you may have already suspected… the greatest contributor to successful organizational change is leadership.  In a studies of hundreds of companies and their change efforts, “Strong Executive Sponsorship” was cited three times more frequently
than any other contributing factor to successful change  by Prosci (Best Practices in Change Management) in both 2005 and 2009.

If your organization is currently undergoing or contemplating a change, the focus should be on leadership.  There are two elements of leadership that should be fully understood and addressed:

  • Alignment – the extent to which leaders are “on the same page” about what the change is, why it is important, what it will mean to the organization
  • Sponsorship – the things that leaders are actually doing to demonstrate their support for a change such as contributing resources, attending key meetings, and encouraging others to work with the project team

Understanding the degree of leadership alignment and sponsorship around the change and identifying and addressing leadership issues will position the change for success.

Collecting information about leadership alignment and sponsorship that you need doesn’t have to be a big deal.  A few candid discussions and well conducted interviews can do the trick.

Managing Change during ERP Implementations

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

A friend of mine if the President of a mid-size company.  We were having dinner recently and he mentioned that they were evaluating ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) vendors.  Put simply, ERP systems are complex computer software programs that integrate all functions and departments across a company onto a single system.

ERP systems bring together most if not all ofthe data used by an organization into one place.  They link up business processes across an organization as they share information.  Not every department of an organization needs to be part of an ERP system (although the more the merrier in the ERP view), but at least a few functions such as finance, the shop floor, the warehouse, or HR are often included.

One integrated software system for people planning manufacturing runs, taking orders, and generating purchase orders for new raw materials is a powerful tool.  It can have a tremendous payback if used well.  No more taking orders for items that are actually out of stock; no more taking orders from customers who are past due on payments; and no more telling customers they have to call someone else to figure out where their order is.

Although ERP systems can be fantastic for organizations when implemented well, they are not always all peaches and cream.  Customization to reflect a specific business can be hard and expensive.  ERP systems are generally not cheap.  And they aren’t simple to use.

Most importantly, ERP systems require people to change how they do their jobs.  If people don’t change the way they work, the value of a the system be minimal, and the organization can even suffer a hit to productivity and effectiveness as people work around the new system to keep doing things the way they have always done them.

The effective use of an ERP system requires a level of discipline and willingness to share information across departments.  Accountability and communication are key cultural attributes in ERP environments.  If an organization is not a cultural fit for ERP at the outset, the amount of change in store is even greater for people.

To overcome some of these limitations of ERP, it helps to focus on how people work.  Make sure you know very clearly what will be different for each person or role in the organization.  What will Mary have to do differently?  What new information will she need?  How specifically will she need to use the new system?  What decisions will she have to make?  Who will she have to interact with?

To make sure that people are ready willing and able to effectively use an ERP system give them specifics about the changes coming as soon as you know them.  Demo the system so that people can see what the ERP looks like.  Let people do some role-play exercises or games in the system to see what happens when they get things right versus make mistakes.  Train people according to their specific roles.  And create training that is based on business processes, not just the system.

When considering an ERP system, think about the total impact on the business – not just the new software.  Consider the process changes that need to go along with the software, the culture of the organization, and the people who work there.

Where are We Going? A Team Needs a Shared Purpose

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

We recently started working with an organization that is the victim of it’s own success.

A few years ago, this organization was in a phase of explosive growth.  Customers were knocking on their doors, recruiting could barely keep up, and earnings grew and grew.

While growth skyrocketed, they were challenged to field the calls as the phone practically rang off the hook, hire people fast enough to meet the demand, and not mess up their product in the meantime.  They developed new products on the fly when customers asked for new things.  They grew their customer base.  Their headcount ballooned.

Activities that were once done by a small group of guys who could work in a conference room were being done by hundreds of people in several departments and locations.

But, as the saying goes, what goes up must come down.  Actually, they are still kicking some serious you-know-what in the market.  But growth has slowed with the
economic downturn, competitors have cropped up that are giving them a run for their money, and the leadership team has realized that they have become disconnected from the business and each other.

The executives have been so focused looking down to meet the needs in front of them, that they have not done a terrific job of looking forward to the future (where are we going?), or sideways (how does what I am doing link to what you are doing?).

In the rush of the boom times, the executives started to view their peers as barriers rather than as enablers or supports.  They spent as little time together as possible, and when they did get together they became frustrated with each other and got hung up in tactical
details of their business.  They operated in silos.  They developed some level of
frustration with each other.  And they started to think that this group just didn’t trust each other.

While their business results are far from terrible, they are certainly not what they used
to be.  Leaders realize it is time for a change before it is too late.  If this organization is going to thrive in its next phase of maturity, it needs to figure out what the heck it wants to be, and how the executive team is going to take them there.

As the executives have been thinking about how they plan for and execute a long range plan that will take their organization into its next phase of growth, it has become clear that they are all coming from different places.  It was no wonder they aren’t operating well as a team.  They don’t even have a common definition of what it meant to win the game.

The fact that they all have different expectations about what it means to win and what role each of them and their organizations should play in winning, reinforces siloed behavior and erodes the interpersonal dynamics in the team.

If I think we win our game by scoring lots and lots of goals, but you think we win by making sure the opponent doesn’t score more goals than we do, we are coming at the
game from a different mindset.  If we are both be on the field but playing with a different strategy, then we are doing things that we can easily mis-read as either undermining or incompetence.

A group of really strong people with a shared purpose can lead an organization almost anywhere.  A group of really strong people with different ideas about their shared purpose can lead an organization pretty much nowhere.

This group doesn’t need trust-falls or hand holding.  They just need to agree on a few basic questions.  What do they want to be?  What customers will they serve and what products will they offer?

When the executive team can answer those questions and agree to stick to their decisions, they will see that the next phase of growth and maturity for their organization can be just as exciting and enviable as the last.

Change is a marathon, not a Sprint

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email

We have a client that is smack-dab in the middle of a significant change effort. The team is getting tired. They feel like they have been beating the drum forever. They can’t understand why people don’t just GET IT and CHANGE.

But change is a marathon, not a sprint. It’s easy to get mired in the details and lose sight of the success that is slowly building.

When stepping back and looking at what they have actually achieved since getting started, the situation looks a litlte better. They still have a long way to go, but progress is progress. Every step counts.

Take time to focus on what is going right. Remember that persistance is a key characteristic of a great change leader. If things are not going well, then update the plan. Find a way to work around obstacles.

And for all of those things are going well, even if a litlte slower than you would like, keep at it!